Welcome to Ecosystem Guide
Difference Between Natural And Artificial Ecosystem Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Sustainable Ecosystem Change: Is It Possible?
from:Much of the information found on the internet and indeed, even taught in schools today indicates that human activity is to blame for a whole variety of planetary ills, including climate change, depletion of irreplaceable natural resources, and animal and plant species decimation. Oftentimes the paradigm for these articles is that there is a "natural" environment, which has been offset or otherwise ruined by human involvement. However, if we consider the idea that mankind is ultimately a part of his ecosystem as much as anything else, then the question becomes this: is sustainable ecosystem change possible? And if so, what does it look like?
The question begs a bit of explanation. "Ecosystem change" is the term broadly applied to all the changes that have been observed as taking place over the time recorded in human history. For example, there is no dispute to the fact that glaciers have melted and generally shrunk over the past 100-200 years. Photographs show it; recorded data prove it. The debate begins when the question becomes: How much of this is due to human influence, and how much would have taken place in an imaginary world with no humans?
The idea that humans are not "outside" the natural ecosystem, but rather a part of it, means that some amount of ecosystem change may be unavoidable and even desirable. After all, what is there in nature that is not constantly in flux? Trees grow new leaves every season; animals give birth to young and raise them. Anything that is not changing, is dead. So then perhaps some amount of ecosystem change, whereby one ecosystem is converted to another type of ecosystem, is actually a healthy part of nature's course. The difference between humans and everything else is that a salmon doesn't worry when he defecates how it will affect his ecosystem; humans do.
Not to say that there hasn't been a vast amount of human abuse of their ecosystem, wreaking havoc on the animal and plant life forms within those systems; there has. But the question for the 21st century scientist ought to be: does human existence have to include self-destructive ecosystem change? Or could a society exist with a reasonable of comfort, safety, etc., and yet not become a major force for change within their ecosystem?
For future generations, it could be more than just an academic question; it may be the question on which their very survival depends. For if the rate of current ecosystem change cannot be slowed, by almost any account, human existence will surely be wiped out or severely curtailed.
Difference Between Natural And Artificial Ecosystem Specific links
Difference Between Natural And Artificial Ecosystem News
Our Expensive Obsession with Pandas - The Atlantic Wire
 The Atlantic Wire | Our Expensive Obsession with Pandas The Atlantic Wire Had you been paying attention to Twitter yesterday, you might have witnessed a graphic play-by-play of the artificial insemination of the National Zoo's panda Mei Xiang. Judging by the National Zoo's gleeful tweets, it was a glorious moment, ... |
Why the Earth Summit failed - International Socialism Journal
Why the Earth Summit failed International Socialism Journal There is one difference today: the 'Cold War' can no longer serve as a pretext to set aside the real issues. Far from history having ended, its real contours are only now becoming clear. It is not socialism which has failed but…modernity as a whole, ... |
The Evolution Paradigm Shift - CounterPunch
The Evolution Paradigm Shift CounterPunch Are you saying that for at least a half century or so vast billions of dollars of public money has gone to scientists whose work has been rooted in a belief system – ie, the metaphor of natural selection, as Richard Lewontin described it in the pages ... |
La vie en roses - Financial Times
 Financial Times | La vie en roses Financial Times They are also proof that a notable garden can be made by someone who has reached the age of 50 and has no idea of the difference between a bergenia and a begonia. In 1985 Tom Parr was chairman of the famous London decorating firm Colefax and Fowler, ... |